Naturally Unnatural

Online culinary colleges, farm-to-fork restaurants, the rise of foodie culture; the evidence is all around us.

The essential guide cover

Take the Culinary Career Survey

We’ve compiled a checklist of all of the essential questions into one handy tool: career options, culinary interest surveys, educational opportunities, and more.

Campus of Interest*
Program of Interest*

Clicking the "Get the Survey Now" button constitutes your express request, and your express written consent, to be contacted by and to receive automated or pre-recorded call, texts, messages and/or emails from via phone, text, and/or emails by Auguste Escoffier School of Culinary Arts at the number(s)/email you provided, regarding furthering your education and enrolling. You understand that these calls, texts, messages and/or emails may be generated using an automated or pre-recorded technology. You are not required to agree to receive automated or pre-recorded calls, texts, messages or emails as a condition of enrolling at Escoffier. You can unsubscribe at any time or request removal of street address, phone number, email address via Escoffier website.

July 8, 2014 2 min read

How much can we trust food labels?Culinary colleges, farm-to-fork restaurants, the rise of foodie culture; the evidence is all around us. More and more, the societal sphere dedicated strictly to what we eat and how we eat it is growing larger. But does this necessarily mean we’re growing more informed about what we eat? Nielsen, a firm that researches marketing techniques and results, recently released a study that suggests we as consumers are being misled, whether or not we’re aware of it, when it comes to our food purchases.

According to the Nielsen study, Americans tend to buy food based largely on specific words used by the producing or distributing agency in packaging and marketing. The results of the study were released in list format, measuring how much revenue could be attributed to certain words used in the packaging or labeling of food products. The single most significant example was “natural.” The food industry as a whole sells nearly $41 billion worth of food annually bearing the label “natural.”

Here’s the issue, though: the word natural, insofar as its relation to food products, means almost nothing. In fact, the FDA’s definition, as posted on their website, only rules out three factors in determining which items can be referred to this way.

“From a food science perspective,” their website reads, “it is difficult to define a food product that is ‘natural’ because because the food has most likely been processed and is no longer a product of the earth. That said, FDA has not developed a definition for use of the term natural or its derivatives. However, the agency has not objected to the use of the term if the food does not contain added color, artificial flavors or synthetic substances.”

Once this definition, or absence thereof, is taken into account, it becomes clear that the marketing of products under such a moniker is at least somewhat suspect. The list continues on to reveal a plethora of other ambiguous terms responsible for strong drive in revenue into the food industry. While any sort of reaction would require more widely spread information regarding the issue, Temple Northup, a professor at the University of Houston, insists that consumers are indeed being taken for a bit of a ride.

“Food marketers are taking advantage of them [consumers] by misleading those consumers with deceptive labeling,” Northup told the LA Times.

Subscribe to the King of Chefs Blog

Subscribe to the King of Chefs Blog

Get the King of Chefs email newsletter delivered to your inbox weekly. You'll get everything you need to know about culinary & pastry careers, food entrepreneurship, financing your culinary education, and more.